The Virginia State Capitol as lawmakers advance policies that place government permission ahead of constitutional rights.
By Earl “Big-E” Jackson
Virginia’s War on Its Citizens
Virginia lawmakers are advancing a slate of policies that, taken together, reveal a governing philosophy increasingly hostile to the law-abiding citizen.
In the span of days, Democrat-controlled committees have pushed expansive gun control legislation, weakened sentencing for violent crimes, and continued policies that raise taxes and daily living costs.
The message is no longer subtle.
Constitutional rights are negotiable. Accountability is optional and citizens will pay the price. Literally.
A Coordinated Assault on the Second Amendment
At the center of the legislative push sits Senate Bill 749, a sweeping so-called assault weapon ban and a centerpiece of the modern gun-control agenda.
If enacted, it would prohibit the sale, manufacture, transfer, and importation of a wide range of commonly owned semi-automatic firearms.
Despite familiar rhetoric about weapons of war, the firearms targeted are the same rifles, pistols, and shotguns owned by millions of Virginians for lawful purposes, including home defense.
These are not exotic weapons. They are ordinary firearms in ordinary homes.
The bill defines “assault firearms” so broadly that cosmetic features and arbitrary thresholds matter more than function. Critics note that the design mirrors failed bans elsewhere that punish ownership rather than criminal misuse.
The magazine language raises even greater concern.
While some firearm provisions include limited grandfathering, the magazine ban does not. Magazines holding more than ten rounds would be prohibited, with no carve-outs for existing owners.
Lawful owners would face three choices. Surrender them. Permanently alter them. Or become criminals.
This is confiscation in practice, dressed up as regulation.
Permission Over Rights?
SB 749 does not stand alone. Lawmakers are also advancing a permit-to-purchase scheme that requires state permission before exercising a constitutional right.
Under the proposal, Virginians would need a government-issued permit before purchasing a firearm. Fees apply. Delays apply. Expiration dates apply. Discretionary approval applies. All this layered on top of the background checks already required at the point of sale.
Criminals do not apply for permits. Law-abiding citizens do.
The predictable outcome follows. Fewer people exercise their rights. Wait times grow. Denials increase. The right technically remains, but only for those the state approves.
That is not regulation. That is rationing. It reduces a constitutional right to a privilege the state can revoke at a whim.
Additional proposals expand so-called sensitive places, add administrative hurdles, and increase the risk that law-abiding citizens become felons due to paperwork errors or technical violations.
Supporters call it common sense. In reality, it creates legal traps and financial barriers designed to suppress lawful ownership, not stop violent crime.
Disarming Citizens While Going Soft on Violent Crime
As lawmakers criminalize firearm possession, they simultaneously push to reduce or eliminate mandatory minimum sentences for violent offenders.
They have advanced proposals that weaken penalties for crimes such as manslaughter, sexual assault, and assault on law enforcement officers.
Law enforcement officials and legal experts warn that these changes will undermine deterrence and erode public confidence. Officers face increasingly dangerous situations while the justice system signals that consequences are optional at best.
The contrast is impossible to miss.
Firearm owners face new criminal exposure for owning common self-defense tools. Violent criminals face lighter sentences under the banners of equity and restorative justice.
The state focuses more on controlling the tools than confronting those who misuse them.
This inversion of priorities reflects ideology, not accident. Crime becomes a societal failure, while self-defense becomes a moral hazard.
The Broader Cost: Taxes and Affordability
Gun policy does not exist in isolation. These measures arrive alongside fiscal decisions that make Virginia less affordable for working families.
Lawmakers are now proposing an eleven percent excise tax on firearms and ammunition. A targeted tax aimed squarely at a constitutional right.
This goes beyond standard sales taxation. It singles out gun owners for punitive treatment, raising costs for firearms, ammunition, and training while prices already climb.
For working-class Virginians and first-time buyers, the effect is obvious. Fewer options. Higher barriers. Less access to lawful self-defense.
This is not about funding public safety. It is deterrence through cost.
When the state taxes a right, it stops regulating commerce and starts discouraging participation.
Layer permit fees, compliance costs, and felony exposure on top, and constitutional rights increasingly belong only to those who can afford them.
For many Virginians, the math is simple. Fewer rights. Less safety. Higher costs.
A Dangerous Trajectory
Supporters insist we judge each proposal on its own merits. Citizens live with the cumulative effect.
Disarm the law-abiding. Reduce consequences for violent offenders. Raise the cost of living. Then demand trust in institutions that actively diminish safety and autonomy.
This is not reform.
It is managed decline.
Virginia now stands as a case study in what happens when ideology replaces constitutional restraint. The consequences will not stay theoretical. They will reach courtrooms, neighborhoods, and family budgets across the Commonwealth.
Bottom Line
When governments demand that citizens seek their permission to exercise a right, tax that right to discourage its use, criminalize technical compliance failures, and weaken consequences for violent crime, the result is not public safety.
It is a reordered society where obedience matters more than liberty.
History shows that surrendered rights rarely return without resistance. Virginia is learning that lesson in real time.
Signature Block“Big-E”
Earl “Big E” Jackson is the host of The Mission Ready Men Briefing on the SHR Media network. The opinions expressed in this article are his own and reflect a commitment to Biblical principles, primary source research and constitutional literacy. For patriotic apparel and gear, visit MissionReadyMen.com — Apparel for the Patriotic Man of God. For those looking to dive deeper into the documents and debates mentioned here we encourage you to explore our cornerstone articles at SHR Media where we prioritize factual source documents over partisan narratives.
Discover more from SHR Media
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.





