Is this journalism or staged agitation inside a church sanctuary?
What began as a quiet Sunday morning at Cities Church in St. Paul ended with a federal investigation after a group of anti-ICE activists disrupted the service. The target was Pastor David Easterwood, whom the group identified as an active field office director for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). While the protest itself drew local attention, the presence of former CNN anchor Don Lemon has turned a local trespass incident into a national flashpoint for the Department of Justice.
The Breakdown of the Incident
According to eyewitness reports and video from the service, the group entered the sanctuary during the opening prayer. Chanting “ICE out” and “Justice for Renee Good,” the protesters occupied the space and brought the service to a halt, with congregants saying it happened quickly.
The atmosphere was described by congregants as one of “intimidation and trauma.” Kevin Ezell of the North American Mission Board reported that children in the service were “terrified” by the sudden intrusion. Lead pastor Jonathan Parnell was captured on video confronting the group. He asked them to leave the private property, a request that was repeatedly ignored.
Don Lemon: A Quest for Relevancy?
The most controversial element of the day was the role of Don Lemon. Since his exit from CNN, Lemon has worked to maintain visibility in a media landscape that has largely moved on. His transition to “independent broadcaster” has included efforts to adopt an embedded reporting style, similar to figures like Andy Ngo or Julio Rosas.
However, critics argue Lemon’s “man on the street” pivot feels less like reporting and more like performance.
The “Invitation” Video:
Lemon has claimed on social media that he did not know the group that enterede the church. But a pre event clip circulated online has fueled questions. The clip captures Lemon greeting an organizer with a kiss on the cheek and thanking her for ‘inviting’ him to the event.
The “First Amendment” Shield:
Lemon aggressively confronted Pastor Parnell with a microphone inside the sanctuary. He stated he was asserting a First Amendment right to disrupt the service for his ‘journalism.’
This behavior suggests a journalist who is no longer observing the story, but actively helping to manufacture it. For a man who once headlined prime time news, his current role as a “digital agitator” reads like a grasp for a new audience.
The Federal Hammer: DOJ and the FACE Act
Unlike previous protest incidents, this one has triggered a rapid federal response. A.G. Pam Bondi and A. A. G. Harmeet Dhillon have said the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division is investigating the event. There could be possible violations under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act.
The investigation is focusing on:
Physical Obstruction: The FACE Act prohibits force, threat of force, or physical obstruction intended to interfere with people exercising First Amendment religious freedom at a place of worship.
Conspiracy: Video of Lemon with organizers prior to the event has investigators questioning if his role shifted from reporting to active facilitation.
Private Property Rights: Federal officials have stressed that a house of worship is not a public forum. Entering a private sanctuary to disrupt a service can fall outside First Amendment protections.
Conclusion: A Massive Escalation
The Cities Church incident represents a dangerous shift in the protest culture of 2026. By bringing political grievances into a private worship service, activists crossed a legal line that has stood for decades. For Don Lemon, the fallout could be more than just another blow to his reputation. It could become a test case that proves the “journalist” title is not a license to violate the civil rights..
“Sack Head” Shaun
Shaun is the host of Edge of Liberty on the SHR Media network and a contributor at TheLoftusParty.com. The opinions expressed in this article are his own and reflect a commitment to primary source research and constitutional literacy. For those looking to dive deeper into the documents and debates mentioned here we encourage you to explore our cornerstone articles at SHR Media where we prioritize factual source documents over partisan narratives.
Primary Sources and Documentation
We rely on direct evidence and primary source documentation to ensure our reporting remains grounded in factual reality and constitutional law. The following links provide the foundation for this investigation.
Additional documentation includes the federal FACE Act (18 U.S.C. § 248) and the official press releases from the Department of Justice regarding the Eradicating Anti-Christian Bias Task Force.








